Authorization-ready before care begins.
The copilot identifies payer requirements at intake, assembles the packet checklist, tracks status and expirations, and structures denial reasons into workable appeals, with a person reviewing everything before it leaves.
Book a workflow demoAnthem · residential · medical-necessity review
Intake summary · assessment · benefits record
ASAM dimension notes needed before submission
Nothing submits without human approval
What it handles
Early access · shipping with design partners- Payer requirement identification
- Required-document checklist
- Missing clinical-document detection
- Authorization packet preparation
- Medical-necessity draft support
- Authorization status tracking
- Expiration and renewal alerts
- Peer-to-peer preparation
- Denial reason normalization
- Appeal deadline tracking and draft preparation
- Repeated-denial pattern analysis
- Human review before submission
Requirements surfaced at intake, not at billing
Because authorization requirements are identified during benefits verification, your utilization-review team knows before admission which payers need what, and which documents are still missing from the packet.
- Requirement detection from the VOB record
- Payer-specific document checklists
- Missing-document detection
- Packet preparation with human review
Auth packet · residential
6 / 7
Denials become structured work
CMS interoperability rules are pushing payers toward specific, electronic denial reasons. Marsa Health normalizes those reasons, tracks appeal deadlines, drafts appeal support for human editing, and shows repeated-denial patterns by payer.
- Denial reason normalization
- Appeal deadline tracking
- Payer-specific appeal checklists
- Revenue-at-risk dashboard
Appeals queue
5 open
Implementation library
Research the workflow before you evaluate the product.
The guardrail
This module ships to design partners first and is advertised only as it proves reliable. Nothing is submitted to a payer without explicit human review and approval.